Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is one of
the new corporate governance mantras that give some credence to stakeholder
theory of corporations. Studies have examined the interest in, levels and
effects of CSR investments on employees, customers, investors etc. However, CSR
is an intermediate outcome. Corporate legitimacy is what corporations seek to
achieve through CSR although this is not always explicit. This study examines
the relationship between corporate responsibility and corporate legitimacy. Secondly,
corporate responsibility intensity and types of corporate responsibility
activities have been examined from the standpoint of shareholders, customers,
employees and other groups closely linked to the businesses. These are
undoubtedly sections of society but they are role restricted groups. This study examines the less role restricted
special interest groups (SIGs) that represent and/or speak on behalf of the
various components of the society. The study focused on 17 publicly listed Government
Linked Corporations (GLCs) which are pressured by their owner – the government,
to be socially sensitive and responsible in their business activities. The
three main aims of the study are: (i) to determine the level of corporate
legitimacy perceptions of GLCs in the eyes of SIGs as proxies for society
(special interest groups); (ii) to examine whether and which type of corporate
responsibility activities of GLCs influence their corporate
legitimacy perceptions; and (iii) to find out the extent to which the SIGs characteristics
moderate the relationship between corporate responsibility activities and corporate
legitimacy of GLCs. 17 research hypotheses were developed and tested to examine
the relationship between three dimensions of corporate responsibility activities
– philanthropy related, business related and product related and corporate
legitimacy with three SIG characteristics (size, age and access factor) as
moderators. The study employed a cross-sectional sample survey designed to
collect data from a pre-selected list of SIGs obtained from the Registrar of
Societies, Malaysia. From a list of about 22,119 societies, 377 were
shortlisted covering six categories of societies. Partial Least Square-Structural
Equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was used to analyse the data collected from a
sample of 266 SIGs in Malaysia. The empirical results indicate that corporate
responsibility activities significantly influence the corporate legitimacy
perceptions of GLCs by the SIGs. This study also found that there is a positive
relationship between two of the three components of corporate responsibility
activities of GLCs: philanthropy and business practices-related and corporate
legitimacy. However, there was no support for the hypothesis that SIG’s
characteristics moderate the relationship between corporate responsibility
activities and corporate legitimacy. The study expands the remit of traditional
CSR studies to truly venture into the societal components which are not
directly dependent on the businesses in questions. Customer, employees and
investors are important direct stakeholders in the businesses. Studying the
SIG’s perceptions expands the boundaries of the CSR investigations. Secondly,
returning to the latent but the eventual outcomes of corporate responsibility,
links corporate responsibility to its precursor or predecessor construct –
corporate legitimacy. The relationship of corporate responsibility to corporate
legitimacy is in focus in this study. These two lines of investigations make
important contribution to the theory and practice of CSR.